Written by: Craig Mazin, Scott Armstrong & Todd Phillips
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9411b/9411b829e0e7c84f8fb62d3092c28d1d951d57c8" alt=""
The characters have a professed respect for intelligence, talent, racial differences and religion—when Alan confesses a lie, Phil is incredulous: "Alan! You swore to god!"—that they don't actually live. It's a conflict between the pussies (represented by Stu) and the badasses (represented by Phil). (Alan is also coded feminine: he calls Doug at night and hangs up, he's always crying.) But the moral of the story is that both sensibilities are equally important, thus the Tyson tattoo on Stu's face, an almost-clever visual representation of this duality (think Two-Face). Really, The Hangover Part II is a centrist story of interdependence—bipartisanship, dare I say? Or, an illustration of the complementary natures of femininity and masculinity. Maybe that's why the movie is so repulsed by homosexuality (accusing someone of it is considered a great insult, as when Alan tells a 16-year-old pre-med student that Doogie Howser grew up to be gay; actually engaging in it is almost enough to make somebody suicidal): because the movie has no faith in man alone. Could there be something pro-woman about this movie after all?
Keep reading my conversation with Benjamin Sutton at The L Magazine
Watch the trailer:
No comments:
Post a Comment